Soredex digora optime
Insert the exposed imaging plate into the DIGORA Optime and everything is done automatically. It is operated with just two buttons, the on/off and the start button. Positioning the unit where you want will improve your workflow and make daily work more efficient and comfortable. The DIGORA® Optime’s size means that you can place it in the most convenient position for your way of working. This ultimately gives you more time for your patients. These advantages reduce the number of tasks you have to do, thus making everyday work more efficient and flexible.
SOREDEX DIGORA OPTIME WINDOWS
Together with DIGORA ® for Windows dental imaging software, it will increase image processing speed and workflow efficiency.Ĭlinical image quality is a result of the whole DIGORA® Optime concept. The DIGORA® Optime is small, easy to use and fast to operate. Therefore, dentists can purchase any of these systems after considering factors other than those evaluated in this study.The DIGORA® Optime intraoral Digital Imaging System is designed to make work in the dental office easier and more efficient. Though the difference in specificities was statistically significant, the authors question whether the difference between the Digora Optime and the other systems is clinically relevant. However, the authors found more false-positive diagnoses made with the Digora Optime system than with the Digora FMX system. Regarding overall accuracy, the difference between the older and newer versions of the photostimulable storage phosphor and complementary metal oxide semiconductor systems was not statistically significant. The positive predictive value for the Digora Optime system was affected by its high sensitivity and low specificity, and it was lower than that for the two CDR systems (P <. The authors found no significant differences in specificity among the Digora FMX, Schick CDR and Schick CDR Wireless systems, all of which had a significantly higher specificity than did the Digora Optime system (P <. The new digital systems (Digora Optime and Schick CDR Wireless) had significantly higher sensitivities than their predecessors. The presence of caries was validated histologically.
![soredex digora optime soredex digora optime](https://cdn11.bigcommerce.com/s-6yt0oqrnz/images/stencil/1280x1280/products/2708/7222/digora-optime-9802386__11878.1568734026.jpg)
Eight observers recorded proximal carious lesions on a five-point confidence scale. Under in vitro and standardized conditions, the authors obtained radiographs of 160 noncavitated proximal surfaces using the Digora FMX (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland), the Digora Optime, the Schick CDR (Schick Technologies, Long Island City, N.Y.) and the Schick CDR Wireless (Schick Technologies) systems. The authors conducted a study to compare the accuracy of an older and newer version of two intraoral digital systems in terms of radiographic detection of proximal carious lesions.